從文物真品收藏到文創商品行銷
歷史文物的產業化進程──從《高堡奇人》中的二元思維與資本主義邏輯談起

曾瑞華*

摘要

本文透過紀傑克論諾斯底主義與資本主義的觀點閱讀迪克的架空歷史小說《高堡奇人》。透過小說中架空歷史的敘事結構與文物收藏的故事情節，本文指出，儘管作者原本企圖藉由對虛實的顛覆與對文創複製商品的抗拒擺脫卑劣的物質世界，以臻至完美的靈知世界，其對真實的執著（一如其明顯可見的諾斯底主義色彩）不僅沒有讓他更接近真實的理想世界，反而讓他因僵固化（或物化）的價值理念更進一步地深陷於虛幻的觀念迷宮──或即紀傑克理論中所描述的最具法西斯主義色彩的利比多轉化機制：資本主義體制。例如，儘管從事歷史文物與原創手工藝品買賣的契爾丹先生反對在開模量產文創商品的產銷過程中，原創的美國手工藝品只能做量產商品的模子，對於資本主義抹殺原創真品價值的運作更是強烈不滿，其對原創真品的看重事實上仍是與資本主義商品區隔的運作邏輯互嵌的。基於此，他所拒絕量產的文創商品不僅不會消失，反而得以藉由其所值的價格流通市場，間接鞏固他所批判的資本／重利主義。全文共分四節，首節論證小說中的二元思維與諾斯底主義色彩，次節闡述紀傑克有關諾斯底二元思維與資本主義發展邏輯的論述，第三節從小說中與文物收藏及交易有關的細節探討真品收藏與資本主義運作邏輯的相關性，並藉以反思當代社會中商品化歷史文物充斥的現況，末節則從紀傑克的觀點探討如何以更有建設性的態度面對歷史文物的產業化過程。

From Historical Objects Collection to Cultural and Creative Commodities Marketing
Exploring Dualism and the Capitalistic Logic in The Man in the High Castle

Laurie Jui-hua Tseng*

Abstract

This article explores the dualism and capitalistic logic inherent in Philip K. Dick’s alternative history novel The Man in the High Castle by using Slavoj Žižek’s theory on Gnosticism and capitalistic logic. Through an analysis (based on Žižek’s critique on the dualism of Gnosticism) of the futile resistance to the industrialization of the historical objects in the novel, this article, by revealing the conceptual trap of dualism, explains why the author, in spite of his attempt to pursue the immaterial gnosis absent from the present world, still fails to disengage himself from the material world he thought he would be disengaged from. The article comprises of four sections. The first section uncovers the dualistic order and the Gnostic element of the novel. The second section explores Žižek’s view on Gnosticism and its affinity with the operation of capitalism. The third section examines capitalism as the fundamental structure which not only underlies the development of the novel, especially the part involving historical objects collection and exchange, but also dominates the development of our contemporary society where historical objects are driven to be commercialized. Finally, on the basis of Žižek’s theory of non-action the last section attempts to propose a way to confront the capitalization of historical objects better than Dick’s Gnostic approach.

人與物的世界
從班雅明閱讀卡夫卡的短篇故事〈一家之主的憂慮〉談起

黃士元*

摘要

The World of the Human and the Thing
On Walter Benjamin’s Reading of Kafka’s “The Cares of a Family Man”

Shih-yen Huang*

Abstract

遷移與障礙
顧玉玲的《我們》與《回家》

吳慧娟*

摘要

本文從殘障研究的角度，閱讀社會運動者及作家顧玉玲兩部關於台灣東南亞移工敘事作品中的殘障再現政治。本文認為顧玉玲在《我們》與《回家》兩書中採用大量的殘障身體敘事，一方面是詳實地呈現了現今移工的工作場域如同會造成大量傷殘的戰場般危險與不人道，另一方面是藉由逐漸浮現檯面、漸漸為台灣社會大眾關切的「外勞」問題，結合移工與殘障兩者看似分屬不同身分認同運動的主體，來打破社會運動中認同政治的區分與切割，使工傷與殘障和移工議題能被並置於同一個框架來討論，重新檢視自我與他者的界線，並進而想像一種另類的結盟策略和合作關係。本文亦主張，《我們》與《回家》裡的殘障再現，揭示了現代性論述中對「健全」和「發展」的推崇，使得非西方已開發國家現代化歷程中的差異成了「不足」和「缺陷」，不僅批判了資本主義社會對健全能力意識形態的固著，更是從身體做為個人生命經驗和身分認同的物質基礎來重新詮釋全球化和亞洲現代性。

Migration and Disability
Ku Yu-ling’s Our Stories and Return Home

Grace Hui-chuan Wu*

Abstract

The essay explores the relation between migration, disability, and inter-Asian modernity in Ku Yu-ling’s Our Stories and Return Home. With an emphasis on the representation of people with work-related disabilities, including people who suffer from mental illness caused by inhumane working conditions, this essay looks at how Ku’s stories of disabled migrants unfold the underlying assumption of ableism embedded in the cultural practice of transnational labor migration. This essay examines how Ku’s books retell individual stories of migration that foreground the lived experience of bodily difference, both as racial markers and physical/mental impairment. This essay asks in what way disability studies and migrant narratives converge in Ku’s Our Stories and Return Home and how Ku’s texts manage the relation between socioeconomicmobility and disability, thematizing disability as a critique of global capitalism. Reading disability both as a real-life experience and as a metaphor, this essay argues that Our Stories and Return Home envision dependency as an alternative model of inter-Asian modernity, in which the impossibility of wholeness invites new forms of social relations. Furthermore, the essay also examines how Our Stories and Return Home, by foregrounding bodily materiality and vulnerability, challenge the notion of ableism and development grounded in Western modernity and articulate “cripple” as a shared history of modernization in Vietnam and Taiwan.

攝影成為見證之物？
從《集中營回憶展》四張照片的影像爭議談起

關秀惠*

摘要

2001年《集中營回憶展》（Mémoire des camps）展出了由奧許維茲－伯肯諾納粹集中營博物館（Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum）館藏，由集中營內部偷拍而成的四張照片。當時法亞曼（Gérard Wajcman）等人批評這四張照片是個謊言，無法證明集中營曾經存在，但策展人之一的笛笛－余柏曼（Georges Didi-Huberman）在《影像儘管所有》（Images malgré tout）一書反駁法亞曼等人對其偏頗的解讀方式，並提及對方在影像認識論上的侷限。笛笛－余柏曼的書名「影像儘管所有」有兩層意思，第一層是儘管納粹禁止任何集中營的影像流出，這些集中營影像仍被偷藏攜帶出來，第二層的意思則是強調，儘管我們無能力去瞭解集中營影像顯露的事件，我們仍要持續地讓任何描述集中營事件的影像發生，意即他在書中意圖逆轉法亞曼所代表的對於集中營影像的「無法想像」（unimaginable）概念的限制。本文企圖從此四張照片引起的爭議開始，討論此爭議所涉及的影像生產以及因為影像認識論框架而來的「攝影」被當作事件見證之物的爭議。另，本文試圖經由笛笛－余柏曼所提到的，從各種文本檔案、影像、證言所提供的記憶與可讀性影像需求中，事件後影像的現身可作為批判觀點（critical point）的角度出發，進一步討論攝影如何成為事件見證之物，以及其所內含的影像辯證性（dialectical）意義為何。

The Photograph as Witness
The Debate on the Photo-Historical Exhibition Mémoire des camps

Hsiu-Hui Kuan*

Abstract

論新加坡「組屋」的翻譯功能及其社會屬性的演變

陳敏華*、崔峰**

摘要

An Analysis of the Evolving Functionalism and Social Qualities of Zu Wu in Translation

Minhua Chen* and Feng Cui**

Abstract